Evaluating Self-Hosted Video Streaming
I wanted a simple, low-resource solution for hosting and embedding small videos—ideally something lightweight, easy to deploy, and self-contained. After some research, I settled on PeerTube.
Requirements
My main criteria were:
- Easy to deploy via Docker
- Supports embedding videos and playlists in external blogs
- Supports both individual video uploads and playlist grouping
- Low resource usage (ideally with 512 -1 GB of RAM)
- Enables video downloads
- (Optional) Transcoding support for adaptive quality streaming
Evaluated Options
After testing several platforms, here’s a quick overview of the ones I ruled out:
- MediaCMS
- Polished and feature-rich, but too resource-intensive. Even with transcoding disabled, I couldn’t upload a 10MB video when RAM was capped at 512MB.
- Clipbucket
- The video player lacked visible controls. I didn’t investigate further due to this basic issue.
- Owncast
- Appears tailored primarily for live streaming rather than static video hosting.
- Emby
- Lacks a built-in public-facing frontend - at least with the docker setup. I didn’t want to spend extra time configuring one.
Final Choice: PeerTube
I ultimately chose Peertube. It runs smoothly with just 512MB RAM (without transcoding), satisfies all my key requirements, and offers a clean, minimal interface. For lightweight, self-hosted video streaming with Docker, it struck the right balance between simplicity and functionality.